 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
SENSE
Apart from having high SNR, one other
distinct advantages of phased array coil is its ability to perform
parallel imaging to accelerate MRI scan time. Parallel imaging
such as the pioneering SMASH and SENSE achieve reduced MRI scan
time by decreasing the number of sampling position in the phase
encoding step of the K-space. However by doing so, aliasing
occurred. It is then by mean of using sensitivity profile from
individual surface coil, missing phase encoding information can be
approximately recovered and full unaliased field of view image can
be reconstructed. Parallel imaging can at lest reduce MRI scan
time by two fold and this greatly reduce patient discomforts.
Foremost importance in SENSE is obtaining the
sensitivity profile. Either through experimental mean, if you have
excess to a MRI system but can be cumbersome or through numerical
method which required tedious calculation and not to mention if
dielectric properties is consider, the solution will get even more
complicated and time consuming. A quick fix is to use FEKO to
obtain an approximate sensitivity profile. In this section, we will
demonstrate how easily you can obtain sensitivity profile through FEKO and run your own SENSE reconstruction simulation. The example
shown here is for a 2 Tesla (85 Mhz) head coil simulation with
reduction factor of 2. The sensitivity profile is calculated by FEKO while SENSE simulation is written in MatLab.
To begin, 4 surface coils resonating at 85 Mhz placed
around a 4 layered dielectric sphere with each layer having
approximated conductivity, permittivity and permeability that
roughly represent a human head
[8] is shown in Fig 1, this can be set
using the GF card.
|
|
|

Fig 1
|
|
Assuming minimum mutual coupling exist between coils, each
surface coil will then have sensitivity profile which is the
magnetic field strength
[9] in the near field calculated by FEKO as
shown in Fig 2(a)-(d). Here the number of magnetic field data
calculated is 128 x 128. |
|

Fig 2(a) |
|

Fig 2(b) |
|

Fig 2(c) |
|

Fig 2(d) |
|
|
|
According to reciprocity theorem, multiplying
the magnetic field of Fig 2(a)-(d) with a 128 x 128 pixel brain
image of Fig 3, Fig 4(a)-(d) simulate the image received by
individual surface coil.
|
|

Fig 3
|
|

Fig 4(a) |
|

Fig 4(b) |
|

Fig 4(c) |
|

Fig 4(d) |
|
|
|
Fig 5(a)-(d) is the 128x128 synthetic K-space which is obtained by
performing 2D inverse Fourier transform of Fig 4(a)-(b). With a
reduction factor of 2, every even number of the phase encoding
part of the K-space in Fig 5(a)-(d) is not acquired, which we will
then have a reduced 64x128 K-space data illustrated in Fig
6(a)-(d). This will caused aliased image as shown in Fig 7(a)-(d).
|
|
|

Fig 5(a) |
|

Fig 5(b) |
|

Fig 5(c) |
|

Fig 5(d) |
|
|

Fig 6(a) |
|

Fig 6(b) |
|

Fig 6(c) |
|

Fig 6(d) |
|
|

Fig 7(a) |
|

Fig 7(b) |
|

Fig 7(c) |
|

Fig 7(d) |
|
|
|
Using the sensitivity profile of Fig 2(a)-(d),
and solving the unfolding matrix
[3], a full 128x128 brain image is
reconstructed from the aliased images as depicted in Fig 8.
|
|
|
|

Fig 8 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Author
|
UQ ITEE
|
FEKO|
References |
|