[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [microblaze-uclinux] OT?, Performance
# This must be OT for mb-uclinux ml.
At Thu, 13 May 2004 08:13:50 +1000,
John Williams wrote:
> However, as Matthew R. has noted, doing this in the FPGA domain gives us
> much greater flexibility in terms of hardware acceleration. So, a major
> point of doing this microblaze uClinux thing is the design and
> implementation flexibility to help us get the best of both worlds.. or
> at least the flexibility to find a feasible mixed SW/HW solution where
> purely SW or purely HW might be impossible (simply not enough processor
> cycles), or impractical (build a webserver purely from logic? Why?!)
say, if we have perfect C to RTL or HDL compiler, would it be
impractical to build not only web server but entire uclinux kernel and
userland purely from logic?
I have been wondering a few days. what will stop us?
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/