Re: [microblaze-uclinux] Using Chipscope Pro 6.2i

[Johan Bernspång <johan.bernspang@xxxxxx>]

Hi Adrian,

I think that the removal of the opb_mdm instance in mb_vanilla should 
solve the excessive usage of BSCANs. You don't need to use the mdm 
module when you're using chipscope.

I'm not sure if that'll solve the slice problem. How many slices does 
the design occupy without the chipscope core? An ILO monitoring a 
one-bit signal shouldn't use too much of the FPGA though.

/johan


Adrian Wee Chin Mun wrote:

> Hi All,
> 	Got a pretty newbie question....trying to add chipscope to the
> mbvanilla6.1d. I have managed to compile and download it to a memec board
> without issue. I generated a .ngc file and then used Chipscope inserter to
> add an ILO core in looking at just one bit wide data and a depth of 512 and
> also assigning it to the proper connections. After that I have been told to
> rename the .ngo file generated to the .ngc and then rebuilt the download.
> 	However it gives me this error:
> ERROR:Map:105 - The design is too large to fit the device.
> With these two culprits being oversized
> Logic Distribution:
> Number of occupied Slices:        5,778 out of   5,120  112% (OVERMAPPED)
> Number of BSCANs:                    2 out of       1  200% (OVERMAPPED)
> 
> The rest are ok. Any suggestions on what I am doing wrong? I would
> appreciate any advice :)
> 
> Adrian
> 
> ___________________________
> microblaze-uclinux mailing list
> microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au
> Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
> Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/
> 
___________________________
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/