[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [microblaze-uclinux] Re: Re: [uClinux-dev] Regarding the xmbserial
[snip test results]
> I am not sure whether 5/12/20 kb is big enough..if not..then you can accept this as an intermediate result..and also let me know how large is "large text"?..thanks...
I would be pretty confident that it's big enough. Previously it was
possible to crash on only a small cut and paste.
> besides one more thing that I observed here is the serial console was very fast too in responding to my commands..no sluggishness as was observed before commenting that line in microblaze_intc.c..
Yes that's interesting, I noticed it too.
> how is this action of commenting out that line related to the TTY_FLIPBUF_SIZE(if at all)?..both seem to be achieving the same result...of improved speed(servicing all interrupts in good time)...
Reverting the TTY_FLIPBUF_SIZE was just to make sure we could isolate
the effects of the two changes. I am puzzled by the improvement in
interrupt response, my memory of thigns is that the ACKNOWLEDGE_AFTER wa
sthere to achieve exactly that.
If anybody else has a minute to try this out and see how it works for
them, I'd be very interested in the results.
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/