Re: [microblaze-uclinux] Recompiling uclinux for EDK 2.1

[Goran Bilski <Goran.Bilski@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

You can use the latest EDK if you don't enable any of the new features in MicroBlaze.
Each new feature that is added to MicroBlaze is by default disabled.
This is to ensure that we can be 100% backward compatible.
The changes in GCC for MicroBlaze has been to fix bugs.

Göran Bilski

Shawn Tan Ser Ngiap wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 17 September 2004 09:32, John Williams wrote:
  

It's probably possible, but why?  Pre-3.x versions of EDK were pretty
sketchy, certainly the mb-gcc that came with those releases has too many
bugs to successfully build a kernel
    

Aw.. that's not good...

  

Perhaps if you can explain what you are trying to achieve, there might
be a better solution?
    

I've built a verilog model of the MB and I am going to release it on 
OpenCores.. It would be nice to be able to run uClinux on it.. At the moment, 
it's tested by running assembly codes that are compatible with EDK2.1.. I've 
run through each instruction at least once.. So, I know that it works with 
EDK2.1 codes..

It would be nice to be able to run a 'open' OS on an 'open' chip as well.. 
that's what I figured..

  

Regards,

John
    

- -- 
with metta,
Shawn Tan

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBSnm3UgUYbQRKphMRAkxsAJ45rxVtYwbJyKhI8RTuINEvrbWxpwCfUa4z
CyWmw6eFXRdv4NJI4U0We3Q=
=JjiE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

___________________________
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/