From: "Stephen Craven" <scraven@xxxxxx>
Reply-To: microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: <microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [microblaze-uclinux] uclinux / MicroBlaze SMP
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 12:21:15 -0400
For the applications we are considering, a 4-node SMP system should be
sufficient. I do understand that the memory bandwidth is a big issue.
Are there enough BRAMs on a big part to make a NUMA architecture
attractive?
The 2.6 version of the linux kernel has support for NUMA architectures.
Stephen
----- Original Message -----
From: "George Smith" <gesmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 9:11 AM
Subject: RE: [microblaze-uclinux] uclinux / MicroBlaze SMP
> hi
> Thanks for the feed back. In future applications I'll need SMP
> capabilities. It's hard to say how many CPU's should be supported. As
> you've pointed out, there will be other system constraints such as
> memory bandwidth. I'd like to see up to 4 supported however this is just
> a SWAG.
>
> gesmith
> ___________________________
> microblaze-uclinux mailing list
> microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
> Mailing List Archive :
http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/
>
___________________________
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive :
http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/