RE: [microblaze-uclinux] u-boot 1.2.0 petalogix patch.

["Leonid" <Leonid@xxxxxxxxx>]

Well, I thought you have "official" patch, but that will suffice most
likely, thanks. 

My ultimate goal is to port Petalogix's changes into 1.2.0 and I hope
1.1.4 patch will help since u-boot structure didn't change that much.

You see, we have several different architectures (PPC - both "real" and
Xilinx's - as well as Microblaze and ARM9) in parallel development and I
would like to use same u-boot tree for all of them if I can and 1.2.0 is
latest and greatest.

Thanks again,

Leonid.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John
Williams
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 3:38 PM
To: microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [microblaze-uclinux] u-boot 1.2.0 petalogix patch.


Leonid wrote:
> So, what about 1.1.4 patch at least? That you must have I suppose.

I generated the attached out of our revision control tree - it should be

more or less the same as what you would get if you did a diff -Naur 
between the u-boot subdir in PetaLinux, and a vanilla u-boot 1.1.4 tree.

  Is that what you are after?

Regards,

John


___________________________
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/