Re: [microblaze-uclinux] PetaLinux 0.20, including 2.6.20 kernel

["David H. Lynch Jr." <dhlii@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

John Williams wrote:
> We don't have any TEMAC support in there yet, I'm not sure there is a
> mature (or even core-complete) driver for it for 2.6 yet.
>   
    Most of those of us who are doing PPC development are doing some
form of cobbled together
mishmash between the Xilinx/MontaVista EDK drivers and the Xilinx
support already in the kernel.org trees,
or working its way in.
    As an example my Pico E1X BSP, used Grant's MLxxx support that is in
the Kernel.org source as a base,
I added several drivers specific to our hardware. And adds the TEMAC
from the EDK.

    I am working towards something similar arround the MicroBlaze for
our newer cards that use the V5LX parts.
Off the top of my head I can not think of a reason the existing TEMAC
driver can not be hacked into a MicroBlaze.

However without fairly major rewriting the existing TEMAC driver as well
as most of the Xilinx EDK based drivers
are not getting into the kernel.org sources.






___________________________
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/