[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[microblaze-uclinux] XUartLite verse Standard UART in FS Boot

To: <microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [microblaze-uclinux] XUartLite verse Standard UART in FS Boot
From: "Kenneth Schultz" <klschult@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 20:15:46 -0700
Reply-to: microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AciZJtZ9POc46ZdFSDS5OXgohLmVtQ==
Thread-topic: XUartLite verse Standard UART in FS Boot

I currently have a standard 16550 UART instantiated in my design. However I would also like to use the XUart Lite routines in the FS Boot code. What is the difference between a standard 16550 Uart and the UART Lite which is called by the FS-Boot Code?

Ken

Prev by Date: Re: [microblaze-uclinux] Kernel BRAM usage
Next by Date: RE: [microblaze-uclinux] Kernel BRAM usage
Previous by thread: [microblaze-uclinux] Kernel BRAM usage
Next by thread: [microblaze-uclinux]UDP server/client examples
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread