[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [microblaze-uclinux] FS-Boot, EDK 10.1 Spartan 500ERevD



After downloading the image the new FS-boot is going to the 0x27fc0000 address (as reported by the debugger with the breakpoint set just before the GO routine), which is the same address reported from the U-boot booted by the prebuilt FS-boot. All The addresses reported during startup from linux reported when starting with the prebuilt FS-boot agree with those listed in the XPS address map and listed in the auto-config.h file so I am assuming that address mismatch is not the problem. This now leaves me with some hardware mismatch that wasn't picked up during the bit mask generation.
When I run from the breakpoint It then reports
SDRAM :
       Enabling caches :
               Icache:OK
               Dcache:OK
       U-Boot Start:0x27fc0000
       Malloc Start:0x27f60000
       Board Info Start:0x27f5ffd0
       Boot Parameters Start:0x27f4ffd0
FLASH: 16 MB
ETHERNET: MAC:00:0a:35:00:22:01

Hit any key to stop autoboot:  0
## Booting image at 210c0000 ...
Bad Header Checksum
U-Boot>
This is strange since that is in flash and when i boot from the prebuilt FS-boot it passes this point and continues to boot. It is starting to look like it is having problems reading the Flash chip. Any Ideas?

Hubert Bahr wrote:
I guess what you are implying is that Since FS_boot is built inside the XPS and U_Boot etc are built outside they don't refer to the same addresses. I thought that the autoconfig script would take care of that? Where would I check that?
Hubert

Olof Backing wrote:
On 11 okt 2008, at 08.26, Hubert Bahr wrote:

Starting from the Petalogix reference design for the Spartan 500E Rev D Starter Kit I can't get to Uboot from the FS-Boot. The pre-built images work fine. The new images I built work fine with FS-boot image from the pre-built. But it will not boot either U-boot in the flash or a new one downloaded via Kermit. Either way it hangs after the
FS-BOOT:   Booting image...
response.

As far as I can tell the only changes from the reference are the ones that XPS generated in the upgrade from 9.1. Any suggestions as to my next step will be appreciated


Have you checked the baseaddress of the uartlite (or similar)?

/Olof

___________________________
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/


___________________________
microblaze-uclinux mailing list
microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Project Home Page : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~jwilliams/mblaze-uclinux
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/microblaze-uclinux/