[microblaze-uclinux] which version to use?

Subject: [microblaze-uclinux] which version to use?

From: "Terry ONeal" <terryoneal3@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:39:48 -0500

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=yAwZD/pk9jNLDyas1toISkweIgCKN8XLM/T+juCZgNI=; b=rc+ZzU8PVJz+4879espCLNaoFBl9liywVi+JJijkaaxsOFJboriic1Jzjog2cSXDBG /Vjvb72K8J9aXEHg6Kjt4fju4BrrCR4d1mElCtG+hr4D7Cvq6k+U+1hqQvmbvspmYKXS udcd0UZGvgBKZkY3BjdGk1UgXHekkqGZQtPh0=

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=FfmywGBdJqaBfeKZUVrUddwZxooaoW7my9/Puuv4vQtuCg5Cy0OzkPxUOQH568iqo0 LDsrb/y017UVquAdbw9jT33rbzrYcOduQKeemZAmNzJg9RyCjTTswktUj13EMciDmfGk 6HSeFSrPj82W/QDUp4bczW06Li8WmvDr5jrfE=

Reply-to: microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sender: owner-microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I'm starting a new project and I'm trying figure out where to start version-wise. I would like to use a version with MMU support, but I'm a bit skeptical seeing that it is not in an official release as of yet. I understand it is available on the mainline, but how stable is the mainline, and how close is it to being an "official" release? Does anyone have any idea how much testing has been done against the mainline version with MMU support?

Or should I be using the MMU patch applied to the v0.30 release?

Any guidance here would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you,
Terry