Re: [partial-reconfig] Intro, and a few questions...

[Armando Astarloa <jtpascua@xxxxxxxxx>]

>
>
>Against the background of part-reconf, you can't control the tristate 
>behaviour of the TBUFs really. Since the TBUF's tristate control line is 
>routed through the reconfigurable module, but during reconfiguration the 
>route may be broken. This results in trashy signals on the tristate enable 
>input, switching the TBUF "randomly" between active and inactive.

         Hello Tom,

         Ive a question about this:

         If to connect an output of a dynamic part to a signal of the 
static section
         two TBUF are used (own prerouted macro), one TBUF placed into the 
dynamic part and the
         other into the static part, is possible to control safely the 
state of one of the
         static part?. Although the state control of the tbuf of the 
dynamic part is
         not guaranteed, as the fixed section do not change it could be 
possible to "disconnect"
         signals with unknown state during the reconfiguration stage, no?.

         Bye Armando

>Bye Tom
>___________________________
>partial-reconfig mailing list
>partial-reconfig@itee.uq.edu.au
>Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/partial-reconfig/



___________________________
partial-reconfig mailing list
partial-reconfig@itee.uq.edu.au
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/partial-reconfig/