[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [partial-reconfig] Problems, problems and more...
Hi, Tom,
I am very interested in your bus macro that straddle 8 columns. Are you
willing to share some experiences on how to create them? I am facing
similar routing problems using Virtex-II Pro. I am using XC2VP7 on ML300
board.
Thanks a lot!
Jingzhao Ou ( a Tcl guy )
Thomas Reinemann wrote:
> Umar Mushtaq schrieb:
>
>> 1. ) I have a design for VirtexII 250 and it routes fine, but the same
>> design fails to route for a Virtex II 1000... I was thinking it would
>> route easily given the extra space, but it doesn't... and yes I did make
>> the requisite changes to the code etc...
>
> This may depend on the PIP for reading the long line. Sometimes there is
> no PIP in the module where to read the signal. Therefore I use usual bus
> macros straddling 8 columns not 4 as suggested by Xilinx
>
>
>> 3. ) I've searched all over the 'net and have yet to recieve a
>> satisfactory answer to the Bus Macro question... in fact questions... in
>> particular:
>>
>> 3a . ) If you LOC the BM to a TBUF site, say TBUF_x20Y40, how is it
>> on the module boundary, even if one module ends at x = 19 and the
>> other begins at x = 20?
>
> Your modules have to be module A from ... to 19 and module B from 20 to
> ... and you have to place your TBUF at x=18. Your BM has to straddle the
> boundary. How shall this happen, if you place it at it.
>
>> 3b . ) I've asked this before... I can't figure out the tribusR1,
>> tribusL2 etc in xapp290... why do they concatenate the BM control
>> lines in such exact ways? And since the xapp290 BMs are at x = 6 (
>> not a multiple of 4 )
>
> Where did you read that? XAPP290 page two
> 3. Horizontal placement must ...
> This point refers to modules and not BMs.
>
> Bye Tom
___________________________
partial-reconfig mailing list
partial-reconfig@itee.uq.edu.au
Mailing List Archive : http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/partial-reconfig/