[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[partial-reconfig] Introduction



Hi everyone:

 

I’m new here, so, HELLO!!!

 

I’m doing some study on partial reconfiguration based on xilinx device in a Nordic university, and I found this wonderful place. Currently I am still fighting with xilinx PAR. As many of you have observed, If one of your PR module is a microblaze, the assemble phase is almost impossible. And I will also thinking about trying out the ICAP in the next week. So, this is what level I am.

 

And now comes the first question: In the design uploaded in message

 

http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/partial-reconfig/archive/2005/03/msg00016.html

 

If you check those UCF files in the assemble phase, in PACE you can see that the module gebied_3 and gebied_1 overlapped a little. Could it be dangerous to do so?

 

I’m always ready for discussion as long as I have time, so, welcome to send your opinion.

 

BR

 

Kehuai Wu

 

 

 

 

Kehuai Wu, kw@imm.dtu.dk

Department of Informatics and Mathematical Modelling   

Technical University of Denmark   Building 322

DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby , Denmark