[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[partial-reconfig] is static frame necessary??

To: partial-reconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [partial-reconfig] is static frame necessary??
From: Hedi Abdelkrim <abdelkrim_hedi@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 08:32:14 +0000 (GMT)
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.fr; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=hSvYhYpHgmR20mEqsrK/yqOiuzTvx00TN7RXiPxup4PpIuuV5pNr3ieaGKyw2vHaYi34uQg2iLU9NLzukf4SiJW+/8ntCLKs0aA9tkIVSYqeTD0oResauVLKwCbWCAL+h/2m9BnKDlbOUtscBCcyFS53ay0MExfDSK9UT2WRWBQ=;
Reply-to: partial-reconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-partial-reconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi,

I'm trying to implement a simple system on Virtex IIpro, using ML310 board. When I arrive to "par" step for reconfigurable part, an error occur : "here's no "arcs.exclude", this file is generated when we have a static part and I do not have such part. If someone understand me and could help me I would be grateful!!!

Thanks

Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [partial-reconfig] is static frame necessary??
  - From: Enno Luebbers
- Re: [partial-reconfig] is static frame necessary??
  - From: Wenyao Xu

Prev by Date: [partial-reconfig] Partial reconfiguration on ML40X board
Next by Date: Re: [partial-reconfig] is static frame necessary??
Previous by thread: [partial-reconfig] Partial reconfiguration on ML40X board
Next by thread: Re: [partial-reconfig] is static frame necessary??
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread