[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[partial-reconfig] Why are Bus Macros placed in sockets instead of PRRs in designs using EDK?
- To: partial-reconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [partial-reconfig] Why are Bus Macros placed in sockets instead of PRRs in designs using EDK?
- From: "Peng Li" <lipeng.net@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:27:07 +0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=+w0cQcI96SXKbBzS3Y6nHYIirWYEo6pT54zVMNRBiEs=; b=HDuQ19Hk/twmfsK7wkp7kLs4jvAfonF+hrPIktCP0dn5pGf1rwyysY9LSyRMWXdfPe2+mDGQWdJ3qhCxtXZUoXw6g5O4OLaXvzNTTkqdsyQIqft8pFSpnNhdQ/ZQjvjjQl9lhrGVaSEN5PfueaffdBW83FBy3mgwiEYfPkIso28=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=EqAMKg5Df3iKbXf6447FZqCxhEwfhEBVcihFdg0vTsUk8GRB6AGlR9dJ9Ps9Ct6AmuFdB2DuT4/AYpoq2xqVSEjSa9B7hbbohs6Mp241J8fpPFzJJHfAiF3KJaGuozOvZcjG/bKetkTCH4GwR3WB78PF9M5xUqYQNgJtazZrpG4=
- Reply-to: partial-reconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-partial-reconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In PR_V4_app_note.pdf, bus macros are placed in sockets interfacing with OPB buses. I can't quite understand this. It seems to be more reasonable to place bus macros at the border of PRRs and I found in the examples given by Xilinx bus macros were placed exactly at the borders of PRRs, not sockets.