 |
|
|
|
Table 1
List of potential usability factors |
|
|
The
following usability factors were obtained by using a multi-method research
approach and an article about the research was published in the International
Conference on Software Process (ICSP 2008)[1].
|
|
Usability Factor |
Description |
|
1 |
Understandable |
A
process description that helps process performers to understand the
process and process engineers to evaluate the process |
|
2 |
Easy
to learn |
A
process description that requires a relatively small effort to learn |
|
3 |
Well-structured |
A
process description that organises the information in a systematic
way |
|
4 |
Consistently presented |
A
process description that presents the information in a consistent
manner |
|
5 |
Effectively presented |
A
process description that uses an effective mix of text, diagrams,
tables, etc. |
|
6 |
Effectively supported |
A
process description that is supported by an effective mix of
additional materials, such as templates, examples, and checklists
|
|
7 |
Tool-supported |
A
process description that is supported by tools to assist process
communication and enactment |
|
8 |
Complete |
A
process description that contains all the necessary information
|
|
9 |
Concise |
A
process description that is free from unnecessary detail
|
|
10 |
Unambiguous |
A
process description that has a single interpretation |
|
11 |
Up-to-date |
A
process description that provides the latest process information
that is relevant to the current project |
|
12 |
Operable |
A
process description that is easy to put into practice
|
|
13 |
Navigable |
A
process description in which it is easy to find information
|
|
14 |
Tailorable |
A
process description that is easy to adapt to multiple project
environments |

[1]
Mahrin, M.N., Carrington, D., Strooper,
P.: Investigating factors affecting the usability of software process
descriptions. In: Wang, Q., Pfahl, D., Raffo, D.M. (eds.): International
Conference on Software Process (ICSP 2008), Proceedings. Springer,
Leipzig (2008)
|
|
|